Stomach Makes Noises When I Lay Down

In Finance, we are all ... about Scoundrels

This blog is on the wrong way :-), I am stirring in the original complaint when the appetite was the mental diarrhea cerebral meatball. However, there is a majority protest here may not be due to a plethora of them but a lack of that. And it is very unlikely to stop protest a matter of principle "silence gives consent" with which "we have and the administration (*) we deserve / merit."

(*) substitutes administration by the institution of your choice.


To the Point: Saturday morning at Hacienda C / Comandante Fontana Coruña. I take my number of waiting, I'm pleasantly surprised at how empty the place and redoubled with joy when, with my 42 in hand, I find the panel information being served to 41. Seeking the above table 4 of the look and discover the following scenario:
The 41 is not presented (40 also appears on the LCD panel) with which the public servant decided that this entitled you to spend time with a few minutes of private chat. First to 3, then 2 when one of his companions was given for going to work (poor!):
At this level (several minutes) because it was not a message (we will not prohibit officials talk among themselves during working hours!) but a relaxed chat. Meanwhile, 43 had arrived. She did not show any hurry to finish his animated conversation had none of these gestures (hand on the table ready to rotate new chair, glances made the waiting room ,...) showing guilt and / or concern to return to meet their work and end the conversation. Quite the contrary because he seemed comfortably placed on plan "this goes for awhile."

I had then to choose between privileging report and check up where (in minutes) reached the professional shamelessness of this person, or cut the experiment to avoid losing more time. My blood was boiling so I chose to appear before her and ask - with anger but not bad manners - that is dedicated to serving instead of talk. I leave
choose from the following options: What do you think was his reaction:

1. replied that he had no number to be addressed. Replicate
2. was talking to coworkers
3. Object that takes very little time talking
4. reproach that he had another table for treatment
Apologize
5. crossly
   
6. Throwing a companion novel to treat me Keep talking
7. with his colleague
   

Correct Answer (pass mouse over the empty space below to read): The 7 are true, in the order listed, after denials for mine. The 6 and 7 occurred so: called this "companion" (if you can call it that I do not see where the fellowship) and sent him to assist me at the next table ... continue to talk quietly with his .

I do not tire of repeating the mistake is human. Chat instead of working is the "crime" more common in the workplace, it's really pathetic, embarrassing and totally unacceptable are the excuses with which one seeks to justify his error. While a single ["Sorry, I did not realize" + smile + "X, talk about leaving"] had solved the case, each of the 7 answers above is so incredible that is to take your partner by an asshole if you really think that it is going to swallow.
There are many ways to insult, some more subversive than others with the answers and attitude of this officer, I felt insulted.

PS: Is it risky to mess with the Treasury? I do not know and I do not: While I'm easy to identify as a Puto named Greg Gabacho there is only one in my company Coruña is linked in the sidebar of this blog, any advantage has to be your friends geek take you years of calling for reporting and paying every penny. Even if it falls
inspection, I promise to tell ;-)

Tags: Finance , Lack , Officer, Long nose