no doubt already noticed the purchase of the Recoletos and Unidad Editorial, the new media group led by Peter J. Ramírez (this always has a tape in his backpack Mondragón orchestra bathed in boric acid). Here is a shameful manipulation, an attitude contrary to any code of ethics and journalistic ethics:
When: Tuesday to Saturday 29 hours Sunday 30 December and Monday 31 today. What
: Information about the annual general meeting of members of Deportivo Coruna.
What they say the 3 daily newspaper Coruña + As on the subject:
- La Voz de Galicia : headline yesterday that " shareholders challenged the board to consider that the council violated the law " and makes this information center of his attention explaining why: delay in delivery of the accounts until the eve of the meeting and no real audit of them.
- Coruña's opinion: account has been "under suspicion An assembly " and articulates the text around the challenge of the board and the various dark spots of the same.
- El Ideal Gallego : is clear that "Depor The assembly will end in court " and limits thereof in detail both the challenge and the major disagreements between Lendoiro and partners.
- As The Journal: the Madrid also assumes that " The board of Deportivo end up in court" and it focuses its information. In a second review reports that the annual accounts were approved but further underscores the request for cancellation of the meeting.
What tells us Marca? (The parentheses are mine)
- Titula "Lendoiro lowers the value of the current squad of 40 'kilos' " and stresses that " new investors have been concerned by Deportivo " that "It's hard not is to recruit players, is to find "and finally, we emphasized that" The club expects sales of players value of twenty million. " Regarding the latter, the Brand warns us, in response to critics plan not believe it, that this figure " must be taken into account, since the estimates for the preceding year, which amounted to 18.6 million , finally came quite close to what really happened. "
Throughout the article, there are two pearls. The first in a very journalistic assessment:" The council's proposals were approved by an overwhelming (sic) majority. "And second, related, we print the half truth fake world: "There is a sector since the last meeting that distrust dead but does not exceed 2% of votes" ignoring the fact that at each meeting more than 95% of the shares ( about 30,000 of the 30,721 recorded ) is deposited - without the Council to check the list and stop comparing the signatures - the board itself.
And the challenge assembly? A simple story judging by the space he devotes to the newspaper. The last paragraph titled "Challenge" plain and explains that: "Members of the platform" for a permanent transparent Sports' announced at the beginning of the Board to contest (noticing the singular) the same before the courts and left the Assembly . The reasons given (noticing the term argue ) shareholders are that Deportivo were not provided the information of the accounts in a timely manner, and consider that the audit submitted by the club (What audit? there was no audit, accounts only mentioned) is invalid. "
- But it is equally amazing that the day before (Saturday 29-Dec), the day he was going to hold the meeting, members of the newspaper received the news that the club could sign any player of European prestige - even a striker (!!!) - a story that was the only course to offer as the other day, in addition to not knowing anything about the subject, were more concerned about Mr. Lendoiro irregularities such as end partners to deliver the accounts allegedly approving the evening.
- And to make the party complete, today morning (Monday 31-Dec), while the rest of the Galician national press reviews reasons and possible consequences of the challenge, I run into (lie: I was looking:-D) Make an article which explained that the Sports "I knew that the Board was challenged." Neither the press officer had signed Deportivo's own best defense statement:
"Augusto Cesar Lendoiro and its board were aware that the meeting will be held between Friday and Saturday last was totally challenged. From the Plaza de Pontevedra knew that the accounts of the club had to be available to shareholders from the day following the official announcement of the appointment.
not forget (Thanks for reminding us sir ... journalist) that the audit (pardon my insistence but what audit?) ended hours before the first call, so now there would be illegal. After the threat (noticing the term threat and not intended eg ) of a group of shareholders that all agreements are null and void if a judge gives reason to those members who requested the annulment of the assembly, the club is also aware that the proceedings could last long and that will only happen again in the issuance of the beginning of a new assembly (! Subliminal message: I renounce and not any good ... exercise your rights) .
The current policy has a support of over 90% stake (Where do they get this figure?!) , a fact that could also go for (of course, one more addition to the journalist) of club leaders on a possible lawsuit.
- Who : items are from J. Yordi and E. Amado
really I have no words to describe such a disgusting and shameless manipulation. Now I do not even clear if it is less a de Salsa Rosa journalist or a brand. Television had trash. Now thanks to Mr Pedro Jeta, we also press away.
I said: Make manipulates, lies Brand is noticed, felt, Pedro Jeta is the chairman. There's an important question: For what?
0 comments:
Post a Comment