"value or price? Change the World
One of the many contributions of the debate about free culture is be taught to distinguish between value and price , ie not confuse what is worth something what it costs.
A simple example would be Victoria Beckham: it costs a lot but is worth nothing. Although I must admit that the latter is not only a pre-trial based on the fact that a person who not read a book in his life can not be very valuable.
There is another significant example that I've discovered a few months ago: while the English say that time is money in French and English is chosen time is money. As the Castilian
are right, time is of value and not price, a small difference that can bring great happiness. Damn
Friday, June 29, 2007
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
Doom 3 Error During Initialization.
So to all those who want to "change the world", I would like them a series of questions:
- How are you sure I'll like your new world?
- Do you possess a special gift such as "possessor of absolute truth" self-Claim as this responsibility? So exceptional
- / model your behavior on this planet for everyone else wanting to behave like you?
Remember that communism sought to impose a physical force, capitalism is also imposing economic strength by which we establish a "new world better for all (ideological imposition by force), all you do is re-encounter the same stone.
Stop trying to change the world, please, Switch places themselves if they want. Explain to your changes and reasons on their own blogs (instead of preaching / blogs disqualify others) and let us based on our free will to choose which way we want to add ... or not.
Thursday, June 7, 2007
Is Airsoft Illegal In Canada
Llamazares not vote himself fem-ism and masculinism
The title is not the holder of any interview mentioned but most likely the result of applying the fallacy that have been repeated PP leaders following the local and regional elections of the past 27M "to govern the most voted."
This fallacy is not even to the level of sophistry since only a partisan act of faith can make someone found some truth in it. But knowing this technique that is repeated many times a lie to make it really , here are 3 lines to remove it:
If it is to be the most voted list which governs for example, in general, 2008 Llamazares not vote for himself because to do so would be taking away a vote for the PSOE in his race against PP (1) to be that most voted (2) .
The fallacy of the most voted would lead immediately to the vote bipartism so useful. And bipartism is the leading provider of absolute majorities, while requiring pacts multiparty system, the very essence of democracy.
course remember that the defender of this fallacy is always the party that has fewer options for compromise. And do not forget doubt their own lies about her toe shoe is .
(1) The PP has the advantage (if you can call it that) of having the extreme right in-corporations while the PSOE leads to the extreme left ex-corporate .
(2) Llamazares We assume that the PSOE would prefer to win before the PP, although there are always exceptions .
The title is not the holder of any interview mentioned but most likely the result of applying the fallacy that have been repeated PP leaders following the local and regional elections of the past 27M "to govern the most voted."
This fallacy is not even to the level of sophistry since only a partisan act of faith can make someone found some truth in it. But knowing this technique that is repeated many times a lie to make it really , here are 3 lines to remove it:
If it is to be the most voted list which governs for example, in general, 2008 Llamazares not vote for himself because to do so would be taking away a vote for the PSOE in his race against PP (1) to be that most voted (2) .
The fallacy of the most voted would lead immediately to the vote bipartism so useful. And bipartism is the leading provider of absolute majorities, while requiring pacts multiparty system, the very essence of democracy.
course remember that the defender of this fallacy is always the party that has fewer options for compromise. And do not forget doubt their own lies about her toe shoe is .
(1) The PP has the advantage (if you can call it that) of having the extreme right in-corporations while the PSOE leads to the extreme left ex-corporate .
(2) Llamazares We assume that the PSOE would prefer to win before the PP, although there are always exceptions .
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
What Do Women Think About Genital Piercings
Besides that many try to misuse the word machismo as an antonym of feminism, there are even women who claim to be macho. A simple visit to DRAE would surely change their opinion:
Machismo: 1. m. arrogant attitude of men towards women.
The opposite of would Machismo be at the root instead of Male Female ie, get fem-ism: "arrogant attitude of women towards men" .
It goes without saying that there is no word. There is for the simple reason that there has not been the concept. As to whether there will be, who knows if, instead of Planet of the Apes , we will not become Planet women [and I see myself as a sex slave ;-)].
The feminism is a response / logical reaction to a macho society like ours:
( Del lat. femina, woman, female, and -ism).
1. m. Social Doctrine in favor of the woman, who gives capacity and rights heretofore reserved for men.
2. m. Movement requiring equal rights for women than for men.
And of course there will be masculated while fem-ism has not been before / society hembrista). What if there is, besides those mentioned macho (unfortunately) and feminists (we should be tod @ s) are women who believe in male superiority (no name) and / or men who believe in female superiority ( without naming either).
But do not confuse the terms.
Free Watch Digital Playground Movies
Hyenas
A child counts as Louie joke, listening to her teacher explain that the hyenas are laughing about ugly animals that smell bad and eat carrion, raise your hand and asks, "Teacher, if hyenas are ugly, smell bad and eat only carrion, What the hell are you laughing?"
But I do not understand:
If we surrender, we surrender to ETA, Batasuna, the ANV, De Juana Chaos, a. .. We have a traitor ZP president, we have given Navarra, we (the PSOE) organized the M11 with them killing 191 people and then manipulating the entire trial to convict innocent few hills and they are free .. ..
If we have done all that, why get angry, they accuse us around and break (again) the respite?
What are the fucking ingrates ETA!
PD: And how disgusting these hyenas are laughing to throw up garbage ...
A child counts as Louie joke, listening to her teacher explain that the hyenas are laughing about ugly animals that smell bad and eat carrion, raise your hand and asks, "Teacher, if hyenas are ugly, smell bad and eat only carrion, What the hell are you laughing?"
But I do not understand:
If we surrender, we surrender to ETA, Batasuna, the ANV, De Juana Chaos, a. .. We have a traitor ZP president, we have given Navarra, we (the PSOE) organized the M11 with them killing 191 people and then manipulating the entire trial to convict innocent few hills and they are free .. ..
If we have done all that, why get angry, they accuse us around and break (again) the respite?
What are the fucking ingrates ETA!
PD: And how disgusting these hyenas are laughing to throw up garbage ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)